Effects of different drying, extraction methods, and solvent polarity on the antioxidant properties of Paeonia daurica subsp. mlokosewitschii leaves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56580/GEOMEDI39Keywords:
Paeonia daurica subsp. mlokosewitschii, antioxidant activity, DPPH assay, solvents, drying methodsAbstract
The study presents the effect of drying methods (microwave-drying and freeze-drying), different solvents (80% methanol, 99% methanol, 80% ethanol), and different extraction methods on the antioxidant activity of Paeonia daurica subsp. mlokosewitschii leaves, estimated based on DPPH free radical scavenging activity. The highest antioxidant activity was revealed in the freeze-dried leaves. The drying method significantly influenced the antioxidant activity: the thermal microwave-drying resulted in lower antioxidant potential. The solvent polarity also played a significant role in the determination of the antioxidant activity of Paeonia daurica subsp. mlokosewitschii leaves: the lowest IC50 values (specific concentration of the sample required for 50% inhibition) were revealed for freeze-dried plants extracted with 80% methanol, followed by IC50 values obtained for the extraction with 80% ethanol, and the highest IC50 values were revealed for extracts of microwave-dried plants extracted with 99% methanol. The subsequent drying of freeze-dried plant extracts had no significant effect on the antioxidant activity of the extract. The subsequent drying of the methanol extract from microwave-dried plants at room temperature or 40°C significantly reduced IC50 value, however, the results were comparable with those, obtained for the methanol extracts of freeze-dried plants without subsequent drying of the extract. Thus, the optimal method of drying and extraction of Paeonia daurica subsp. mlokosewitschii leaves for preserving the antioxidant activities was established: freeze-drying of leaves followed by 24 h extraction with 80% methanol.
Metrics
References
Bhatt ID, Rawat S, Rawal RS. 2013. Antioxidants in medicinal plants. In: Chandra S, Lata H, Varma A (eds.) Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 295–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29974-2_13
Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C. 2007. Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 297(8): 842-857. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.842
The Red Book of the Georgian SSR. Published by "Soviet Georgia". 1982. Tbilisi
Nadiradze T, Eradze N. 2020. Overview of Paeonia mlokosewitschii L. WJARR 6(2): 05-08. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.6.2.011.3
Fang QB. 2004. Classification, distribution, and medicinal use of Sect. Paeonia of the genus Paeonia in China. Res. Pract. Chinese Med. 18: 28–30. https://doi.org/10.13728/j.1673-6427.2004.03.009.
Li P, Shen J, Wang Z, Liu S, Liu Q, Li Y, He C, Xiao P. 2021. Genus Paeonia: A comprehensive review on traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacological activities, clinical application, and toxicology. J Ethnopharmacol. 269: 113708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113708
Adki KM, Kulkarni YA, 2020. Chemistry, pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, and recent novel drug delivery systems of paeonol. Life Sci. 250: 117544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117544
Sultana B, Anwar F. Przybylski R. 2007. Antioxidant activity of phenolic components present in barks of barks of Azadirachta indica, Terminalia arjuna, Acacia nilotica, and Eugenia jambolana Lam. trees. Food Chem. 104: 1106-1114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.019
Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset CLWT. 1995. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT. 28; 25-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
Blois MS 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 181: 1199–1200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
Bandonienė D, Murkovic M, Pfannhauser W, VenskutonisP, Gruzdienė D. 2002. Detection and activity evaluation of radical scavenging compounds by using DPPH free radical and on-line HPLC-DPPH methods. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 214: 143–147 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-001-0430-9
Elmastas M, Isildak O, Turkekul I, Temur N. 2007. Determination of antioxidant activity and antioxidant compounds in wild edible mushrooms. J. Food Compos. Anal. 20(3-4): 337-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.07.003
Rajurkar NS, Hande SM. (2011). Estimation of phytochemical content and antioxidant activity of some selected traditional Indian medicinal plants. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 73(2): 146–151. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474x.91574
Mediani A, Abas F, Tan C, Khatib A. 2014. Effects of Different Drying Methods and Storage Time on Free Radical Scavenging Activity and Total Phenolic Content of Cosmos Caudatus. Antioxidants. 3: 358–370. doi: 10.3390/antiox3020358.
López-Vidaña EC; Pilatowsky Figueroa I; Cortés, FB; Rojano BA; Ocaña, AN 2016. Effect of temperature on antioxidant capacity during drying process of mortiño (Vaccinium meridionale Swartz). Int. J. Food Prop. 20: 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1155601
Kadam SU, Alvarez C, Tiwari BK, O’Donnell CP. 2015. Processing of seaweeds. In: Tiwari BK, Troy DJ (eds) Seaweed sustainability. Academic Press, NY, pp 61–78.
Hamid SS, Wakayama M, Soga T, Tomita M. 2018. Drying and extraction effects on three edible brown seaweeds for metabolomics. J. Appl. Phycol. 30: 3335–3350.
Geetha S, Irulandi K, Mehalingam, P. 2017. Evaluation of antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of different solvent extracts of leaves of Piper umbellatum. AJPCR 10: 274-276. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i2.15570
Badmus UO, Taggart MA, Boyd KG. 2019. The effect of different drying methods on certain nutritionally important chemical constituents in edible brown seaweeds. J. Appl. Phycol. 31: 3883–3897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01846-1
Pashazadeh H, Zannou O, Ghellam M, Koca I, Galanakis CM, Aldawoud TMS. 2021. Optimization and encapsulation of phenolic compounds extracted from maize waste by freeze-drying, spray-drying, and microwave-drying using maltodextrin. Foods. 10(6): 1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061396
Krokida MK, Philippopoulos C. 2006. Volatility of apples during air and freeze-drying. J. Food Eng. 73: 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.012
Chan EWC, Lim YY, Wong SK, Lim KK, Tan SP, Lianto FS, Yong MY. 2009. Effects of different drying methods on the antioxidant properties of leaves and tea of ginger species. Food Chem. 113: 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.090
Ji HF, Du AL, Zhang LW, Xu CY, Yang MD, Li FF. 2012. Effects of drying methods on antioxidant properties in Bobinia pseudoacacia L. flowers. J. Med. Plant. Res. 6(16): 3233-3239.
Boeing JS, Barizão EO, E Silva BC, Montanher PF, de Cinque Almeida V, Visentainer JV. 2014. Evaluation of solvent effect on the extraction of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacities from the berries: application of principal component analysis. Chem Cent J. 22; 8(1): 48. doi: 10.1186/s13065-014-0048-1.
De Monte C, Carradori S, Granese A, Di Pierro GB, Leonardo C, De Nunzio C. 2014. Modern extraction techniques and their impact on the pharmacological profile of Serenoa repens extract for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. BMC Urol. 11;14: 63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-63.
Nawaz H., Shad MA, Rehman N, Andaleeb H, Ullah N. 2020. Effect of solvent polarity on extraction yield and antioxidant properties of phytochemicals from bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 56. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902019000417129
Saadatian M, Asiaban K. 2019. Effect of solvent, time and temperature on the some chemical properties of Salep tuber (Anacamptis Collina). Int. J. Botany Stud. 4(4): 7-12.
