For Reasonably Protected Competition and Economic Regulation by "Atomic Balance"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56580/GEOMEDI0005Keywords:
Perfect competition, state regulation, free market self-regulationAbstract
The presented research showed, that the US has the best experience in an evaluating and protecting competition, but there is one essential imperfection in the understanding of perfect competition since the time of the classics of economic theory. This is important to have many competitors, but not very or infinitely many, as traditional "classic" specialists and even some official structures and persons think about fineness of really genius competition.
After pandemic and many conflicts period in modern global development, if we again don't correct this understanding, we can finally damage democracy with science-intensive businesses and help to different dictatorial monopolies.
If in the early years of my research, I considered the main obstacle to effective competition - unscrupulous big business, but now I think that an equally serious problem is the artificial fragmentation of honest and talented big producers.
Only with a reasonably protected competitive environment, by our observation of science-intensive areas of Healthcare Economy and Machine-building Industry, it is possible to organize a reasonable combination of state regulation factors and free market self-regulation.
The factors of regulation and self-regulation should be in non-monopoly equilibrium, like electrons and protons in an atom. Otherwise, as we know from history, we get different dictatorships or great depressions of surplus.
Metrics
References
Charles Janeway et al. Immunobiology; Fifth Edition (неопр.). — New York and London: Garland Science (англ.). 2001. — ISBN 0-8153-4101-6.
Yusuke Kasuga et al. Innate immune sensing of coronavirus and viral evasion strategies. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 53, pages 723–736 (2021).
Fung, T. S. & Liu, D. X. Human coronavirus: host-pathogen interaction. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 529–557 (2019).
Tse, L. V., Meganck, R. M., Graham, R. L. & Baric, R. S. The current and future state of vaccines, antivirals and gene therapies against emerging coronaviruses. Front. Microbiol. 11, 658 (2020).
Li, F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 3, 237–261 (2016).
Thiel, V. et al. Mechanisms and enzymes involved in SARS coronavirus genome expression. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 2305–2315 (2003).
Angelini, M. M., Akhlaghpour, M., Neuman, B. W. & Buchmeier, M. J. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 6 induce double-membrane vesicles. mBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00524-13 (2013).
Subissi, L. et al. One severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus protein complex integrates processive RNA polymerase and exonuclease activities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3900–E3909 (2014).
Snijder, E. J., Decroly, E. & Ziebuhr, J. The nonstructural proteins directing coronavirus rna synthesis and processing. Adv. Virus Res. 96, 59–126 (2016).
Eckerle, L. D., Lu, X., Sperry, S. M., Choi, L. & Denison, M. R. High fidelity of murine hepatitis virus replication is decreased in Nsp14 exoribonuclease mutants. J. Virol. 81, 12135–12144 (2007).
Ivanov, K. A. & Ziebuhr, J. Human coronavirus 229E nonstructural protein 13: characterization of duplex-unwinding, nucleoside triphosphatase, and RNA 5’-triphosphatase activities. J. Virol. 78, 7833–7838 (2004).
Chen, Y. et al. Biochemical and structural insights into the mechanisms of SARS coronavirus RNA ribose 2’-O-methylation by Nsp16/Nsp10 protein complex. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002294 (2011).
Chen, Y. et al. Functional screen reveals SARS coronavirus nonstructural protein Nsp14 as a novel cap N7 methyltransferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3484–3489 (2009).
Takeuchi, O. & Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140, 805–820 (2010).
Krieg, A. M. AIMing 2 defend against intracellular pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 11, 367–369 (2010).
Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X. & Chen, Z. J. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339, 786–791 (2013).
Yoneyama, M. et al. The RNA helicase RIG-I has an essential function in double-stranded RNA-induced innate antiviral responses. Nat. Immunol. 5, 730–737 (2004).
Geijtenbeek, T. B. & Gringhuis, S. I. Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 465–479 (2009).
Iwasaki, A. & Medzhitov, R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat. Immunol. 16, 343–353 (2015).
Li, K. et al. IFITM proteins restrict viral membrane hemifusion. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003124 (2013).
Thiel, V. et al. Mechanisms and enzymes involved in SARS coronavirus genome expression. J. Gen. Virol. 84, 2305–2315 (2003).
Spence, J. S. et al. IFITM3 directly engages and shuttles incoming virus particles to lysosomes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 259–268 (2019).
Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C. & Garry, R. F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 450–452 (2020).
Fajgenbaum, D. C. & June, C. H. Cytokine storm. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2255–2273 (2020).
